Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Walk #4 Cocooned vs Engaged
Monday, May 30, 2011
Walk #2 Desired Lines










"No U turn".
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Project #2 Option #2 Inside/Outside the "scene"
Style Wars Response
When I was younger, my sister would write her name, Kelly, over everything. She still does. The infatuation with her name not only gave her the reassurance that “Kelly Green” not only stood as color but also the “cutest” color. (She had an infatuation with wallets and what not with the color, it continues today). She took pride in her name and let everyone know. Her name became a symbol. As I continued to see the name Kelly and the color green, I quickly developed a brand, something more local than the marketing of Coca-Cola, but yet just as powerful. As a little boy, I was confused, sometimes angry. My manila envelope filled with the weekly news in my 2nd grade class to my mother was tagged on both the back and the front with a delicately and artistically rendered version of the name Kelly. It was not only an art, but also an obsession to my sister. I don’t even know if she could tell you why she did. She just liked doing it.
“Graffiti...is not an art…Graffiti is the application of a medium to a surface. Is that an art form? I don’t know, I’m not an art critic. But I sure as hell can tell you that that is a crime…” said detective Burny Jacobs. Hell, if I didn’t believe in artists like Banksy, Shepard Fairy or any other contemporary street artists I might have an easy time agreeing with the detective. However, isn’t the “application of a medium to a surface” apply to most art throughout time, isn’t that, from what I’ve been taught at the basic level, art? Isn’t it an expression of the individual? It can sure as hell get me mad that my sister tagged my folder and that New York City youth ruined half of Manhattan’s rail system because of a personal expression. I’d say that both my sister and the New York City youth dealt with a similar problem. I believe that both the physical and metaphorical vehicle for which they both expressed themselves was and is partially incorrect and that in the time between 1982 and now, vehicles like the internet, student galleries and liberal publications has allowed for the younger generation, one who is interested in a jazz-like, bop form of expression to bring their symbol and voice to the world.
Today’s “graffiti artists have taken the form and idea of street art into a proper and more appropriate space. I’m not saying that vandalism is acceptable is appropriate, but I do believe that the symbols and ideas that the artists now today are expressing are far more advanced and developed than those in the short film ‘Style Wars’.
Banksy may be the most respected street artist today. He has turned what even I found unattractive in earlier street art and graffiti into works that are purposeful and meaningful. Pieces on Israel’s west bank barrier have not only become a symbol of the artist, but also an act and address of the something wrong. Kids playing amongst the wall with the gate to a “paradise”. The kids are playing right? Or are they painting? Are they waiting? What is odd and wrong about this? What is odd and wrong about our world? Questions are asked by the artist and not by the viewer. Banksy writes, “How illegal is it to vandalize a wall,” asks Banksy in his website introduction to his Wall project, “if the wall itself has been deemed unlawful by the International Court of Justice? The Israeli government is building a wall surrounding the occupied Palestinian territories. It stands three times the height of the Berlin wall and will eventually run for over 700km - the distance from London to Zurich. The International Court of Justice last year ruled the wall and its associated regime is illegal. It essentially turns Palestine into the world’s largest open-air prison.”
Back to my vehicle. Back to my sister. Back to the beginnings of street art. Just the beginning. Street artists, or writers, and you can include my sister if you want to, found a physical and metaphorical vehicle to express themselves that the local world around them would see. The train would pass through downtown, in and around Manhattan for everyone to see their name, their symbol, themselves. These young artists took pride in what they did. My sister took pride in what she did despite my disappointment.
With the advancements of technology and especially the Internet, street art and graffiti has begun to take hold of a more respected market. It is now not only trains that are tagged, but it is also the street walls, streets, lampposts, signs; everything and anything that the world takes in daily. The world now becomes flipped upside down. Someone in Nebraska notices Banksy’s piece of a paradise in Gaza and wonder’s, “wow…that is powerful”. While locals in Israel debate whether or not it is art, much like the angry locals in NY, He or she in Nebraska is sending the art via email to his friend over instant messenger. The idea of the wall, in Nebraska, no longer becomes a local idea but a global idea and metaphor. Street art has only really begun to show itself in an articulate manner. Artists like Banksy have forwarded the idea that this work brings about what really needs to be written.
Whatever the case may be, it is hard to now criticize earlier graffiti and street artists who found their medium as a respected and legitimate form of expression. It’s similar to Lebron James boasting about his pre-season predictions of multiple championships. (Even though I hate Lebron, I’m sure great things will come from the earlier turmoil of the Heat). Earlier street artists saw something great. They believed in their art. Some even lost limbs, some lost the respect of their family, and most lost the respect of the community. But whatever it was, they saw their vision. They saw a wall that needed to be painted over with a view of paradise.
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Walking: Mapping Senses






Sunday, May 22, 2011
Project #1
This A M E R I C A N l i f e
R i v e r s and T i d e s
There was something so soothing about the video of Rivers and Tides. The sound of the water, the crack and snap of the wood. It all brought me closer to the artist's hands, it reminded me of my grandfather and when he would work on his ranch. I remember him telling me that there was something so satisfying about working with your hands, creating something, something tangible, something that anyone could use and appreciate, something that was well made and that could last forever. My grandfather was a contractor, yet he never physically built the buildings himself. He watched. He said that he envied his workers because they made something tangible. Something that they could go home feeling satisfied with. They could go home and say they created something for someone else. Something that will last.
Andy Goldsworthy is an artist, a teacher, a father and a lover of the out doors. He seems to enjoy the morning and the solitude that it brings. The coming and going, the ebb and the flow, the balance between destruction and creation. Andy's art is exactly that. Like my grandfather, he works with his hands. However, his art does not last. When working with icicles, he included that working with gloves, despite that it was bitterly cold outside, restricted him from the proper attention to his art.
"I am influenced by the rivers and the ocean", he said. And in response, his art clearly mimics his inspiration. His icicle creation lasted minutes, much like a song, building slowly to its crescendo lit by the sun behind it, and then its demise, it fell. It was amazing to watch the ice glow in contrast to the rock it was glued to. It seemed as if it was once piece of radioactive material. It is that fleeting and precious quality of his work that makes it so unique and special. But the fleeting quality of it is also tragic, because only he or sometimes a passerby are the only who witness his work. Andy commented about its particular quality of it being created and destroyed by what it was created by.
Though his work may flee the mind, his work does not escape documentation. With every work, Andy documents the final creation by photographing it. Whether it was good or bad, its film negative sits gingerly in his workshop behind all his other works, documented, organized and placed against light tables. The photos of his work deliver an appropriate message to how strong photography can be. Not about the technical capabilities, but about its ability to capture something as fleeting as the ocean's tide, a pigment of read amongst a slew of water, an icicle burnt by the sun, a collection of sticks blowing in the wind.
Though I probably shouldn't have, I found it particularly interesting, amusing, and tragic when one of his pieces collapsed while he was creating it. You could see a real connection in the despair of his face. He really felt disappointed. Unlike a mistake made in the comfort of a studio where in the mediums photography, painting, or sculpture can be repaired; his ability to repair is replaced by rebuilding. Every time one of his works fails, he must start again, from the beginning. But in the end, proved by meticulous and delicate work, his masterpiece and crescendo come full force. You see the beauty of his work framed against the nature that has both created and will destroy the piece. It is this connection and relationship that he has with the land that keeps him coming back for more. It is not the land that needs Andy, as he puts it, but it is he who needs the land. I think in that understanding is what every artist should be humbled by. Too much do I see, or even that I believe myself has created something special from something bleak or mundane. We have yes, but it has also been set forth for us, created by something other than the forces within ourselves. Like the rocks that created his eggs, our subjects are randomly placed in front, sitting there only for us to manipulate and interpret through our own medium.
His artistry reminds me of the character Howard Roark of the novel "The Fountainhead", by Ayn Rand. The novel is based loosely on the genre of architecture and the creative process behind it. But what really stands out is the singular creative vision of Howard Roark, the individual against society. Howard says, "I do not create in order to have clients, but that I have clients in order to create". It is this same principle that I believe Andy is driven by. Its almost as if the land has commissioned him to make his work. Just as Roark needs his clients to commission and inspire his work, Andy needs his land to commission and inspire his also. In his description of the and that was flattened by the sheep, he pays homage to that destruction through a line of sheep wool that acts as a metaphor for the control and dominance of the sheep on the land. Much like Roark also, Andy is really set upon the world as an individual. His work is mostly done by himself with the help of others occasionally and sparingly. Hs work is a representation of his singular vision of the world, and my god is it beautiful.
As I have been alluding to architecture, his work draws the lines and shapes, much like the modern and contemporary architects; from nature and the rhythms it creates. Frank Lloyd Wright believed that his work, especially his work "Falling Water", was meant to be a part of the world around it. Andy too, feels the same way. His piece made of swirling branches imitates the forms and rhythms of the tide pool it eventually becomes apart of. It is that symbiosis and cooperation of nature and man that is a balance that I find particularly attractive. It is something that I believe our world should look further into.